James Ross filed a lawsuit against F.W. Webb Company and Joseph Jaskal alleging employment discrimination and retaliation. The specific nature of the underlying claims and Ross's employment history with the plumbing and heating supply company were not detailed in the motion documents.
Defendants argued they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Ross lacks evidence showing discriminatory or retaliatory animus. The defendants contended there is no genuine dispute of material fact warranting a trial, making summary judgment appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
The motion was filed April 6, 2026, and included supporting documents such as a memorandum of law, statement of undisputed material facts, and an affidavit from defense counsel Alice Kokodis. Defense lawyers certified they attempted to confer with plaintiff's counsel in March and April to narrow the disputed issues.
The motion seeks dismissal of Ross's entire complaint, which could end the case without trial if granted. Employment discrimination cases often turn on whether plaintiffs can demonstrate discriminatory intent, making summary judgment motions common when defendants argue insufficient evidence exists.