The consolidation brings together lawsuits filed by Rebecca Blount, Cheryl McCulley, Stephen Schlaugies, Terri Ufko, Stephanie Spikes and Kyle Park against Cerner Corporation, which operates as Oracle Health, and various hospital defendants including Bon Secours Community Hospital, Good Samaritan Hospital, St. Anthony Community Hospital and Ascension Health. The cases all appear to stem from a data breach involving the healthcare technology company.
Judge Phillips ordered the consolidation 'pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and consistent with previous Orders consolidating other similar cases.' The ruling indicates this is part of a broader wave of litigation over the alleged breach, with the court having already consolidated other similar cases in previous orders.
The court designated the lowest-numbered case, Case No. 25-00259-CV-W-BP originally filed by Blount and McCulley, as the lead case for all future proceedings. 'All future filings shall be made only in the lowest numbered case,' Phillips wrote, streamlining the litigation process.
The consolidation order requires attorneys to use a simplified caption reading 'In re: Cerner/Oracle Data Breach Litigation' rather than listing all individual case captions. However, if a filing relates to only some of the consolidated cases, the filing party must 'indicate the cases to which the filing relates in the caption under the Case Number.'
The individual cases involve different combinations of defendants, suggesting the alleged breach may have affected multiple healthcare facilities that use Oracle Health's technology platforms. Cerner Corporation, now operating as Oracle Health after Oracle's acquisition, appears as a defendant in most of the consolidated cases.
The court's decision to consolidate 'at least for all pretrial purposes' leaves open the possibility that individual cases could be separated again for trial if factual or legal differences emerge during discovery. The consolidation is designed to promote judicial efficiency and avoid duplicative discovery in cases arising from the same alleged incident.